Conduct a governance review of an exhibit continuity failure
You are a Detective Sergeant conducting a governance review.
What has happened
The quarterly exhibit audit found that a cash exhibit from an August drug matter was recorded without a second member at the count and that a movement to the laboratory was not signed for by the receiving person. The matter is listed for a committal hearing in November and the defence has requested continuity statements. The Detective Senior Sergeant has directed a governance review: establish what happened, whether the Exhibit Handling and Continuity Procedure was followed, what the evidential consequences are, and what must change. The two members involved are available for interview. The investigation plan for the matter needs to be rewritten to close the gaps before the brief is served.
Deliverables
- Timeline of register entries with departures identified
- Interview plans and records of interview
- Governance review report with corrective actions
- Revised investigation plan
- Incident Log record of the review
Documents to use
Systems to use
Property and Exhibits Register
The continuity record for every item of property and every exhibit seized, found or surrendered, from seizure to return or disposal.
Incident and Occurrence Log
The district record of every reported incident, occurrence and complaint, from first report through investigation to closure.
Units of competency
Current on training.gov.au for the Police Training Package as at 10 September 2026.
POLGEN007Review policing governance and accountability compliancePOLINV029Manage information within investigationsPOLINV026Plan police investigationsPOLINV030Conduct investigative interviewsPOLINV034Manage complex investigationsQualifications
POL65125Advanced Diploma of Police InvestigationPOL80125Graduate Certificate in Police InvestigationWhat to look for
Evidence guide
Evidence should show a factual timeline built from the register, interviews that are fair and recorded, a clear distinction between process failure and misconduct, and an honest assessment of what the court will be told. Corrective actions must have owners and dates. The revised investigation plan should be practical and should never involve altering or deleting the original register entries.